Legal Opinion

State v. Crouse

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 5, 2005No. COA04-804PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCullough, Judge.

Defendant (Anna Danielle Crouse) appeals from conviction and judgment for malicious conduct by a prisoner. We hold that she received a fair trial, free of prejudicial error.

On 8 April 2003 Officer Sprinkle with the High Point Police Department was dispatched to a home on South Road in High Point, North Carolina to “check[] on the welfare of the defendant.” Shortly after arriving Officer Sprinkle and some other officers were able to get defendant to exit the dwelling. According to one of the officers, defendant “had a dazed look, [an] almost. .'. not completely coherent type…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. KemmerlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  3. State v. BogleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  4. State v. AgnewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. Euceda-ValleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. Johnson v. City of FayettevilleDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015
  3. State v. NoelCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. State v. ArtisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. State v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API