Hill v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, Judge.
John Hill (Claimant), appeals an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) to dismiss a Claim Petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
The facts are not in dispute. Claimant was a deckhand on a ship, the “Spirit of Philadelphia,” a tour boat that plies the navigable waters of the Delaware River. The WCJ’s critical findings of fact describe Claimant’s duties and injury as follows:
5. This [WJorkers’ [Cjompensation Judge has reviewed the record as a whole and finds that it supports the following…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chandris, Inc. v. LatsisSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. BassettSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- O'Donnell v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Sun Ship, Inc. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Warner v. GoltraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Arlet, R., Aplt. v. WCAB (L&I)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- R. Arlet v. WCAB (Dept. of L&I, BWC)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020