Legal Opinion

Hill v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 1997No. 1376 C.D. 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

John Hill (Claimant), appeals an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) to dismiss a Claim Petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

The facts are not in dispute. Claimant was a deckhand on a ship, the “Spirit of Philadelphia,” a tour boat that plies the navigable waters of the Delaware River. The WCJ’s critical findings of fact describe Claimant’s duties and injury as follows:

5. This [WJorkers’ [Cjompensation Judge has reviewed the record as a whole and finds that it supports the following…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chandris, Inc. v. LatsisSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. BassettSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. O'Donnell v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Sun Ship, Inc. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Warner v. GoltraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arlet, R., Aplt. v. WCAB (L&I)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  2. R. Arlet v. WCAB (Dept. of L&I, BWC)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API