Legal Opinion

Ziess v. Semenov

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 22, 1985PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order entered August 29, 1984 modified by denying tenant’s motion for summary judgment and, as modified, affirmed, without costs.

In this holdover proceeding brought on or about December 1, 1983, petitioner seeks possession of tenant’s stabilized apartment on the ground that the apartment is not occupied as tenant’s primary residence/The petition alleges that the apartment is presently subject to the Rent Stabilization Law of 1969 (Administrative Code of City of New York § YY51-1.0 et seq.) (ch 576), because it was subject to rent stabilization on June 30, 1974. The Civil…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Park South Associates v. MasonCivil Court of the City of New York · 1984
  2. Park South Associates v. MasonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1984
  3. Central Park South Associates v. HackelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Ehrlich v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1984

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Seagrave Establishment, Inc. v. GoldbergCivil Court of the City of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API