Legal Opinion
Hamzik v. Comm'r
United States Tax Court
Decided October 5, 2004No. 4171-04LUnpublished
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARD HAMZIK, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Hamzik v. Comm'r
No. 4171-04L
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 2004-223; 2004 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 234; 88 T.C.M. (CCH) 316;
October 5, 2004, Filed
Judgment entered for respondent.
Richard Hamzik, pro se.
Wendy S. Harris, for respondent.
Laro, David
LARO
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LARO, Judge: Petitioner, while residing in Gardnerville, Nevada, petitioned the Court under section 6330(d)(1)(A) to review the determination of respondent's Office of Appeals (Appeals) that respondent may proceed with a levy upon petitioner's property to collect…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sundstrand Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Sundstrand Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
- United States v. Ruth StudleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Florida Peach Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.