Legal Opinion

Neochloris, Inc. v. Emerson Process Management LLLP

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 13, 2015No. 14 C 9680PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion and Order

Honorable Edmond E. Chang, United States District Judge

I. Introduction

Plaintiff Neochloris owns patent number 6,845,336 (the '336 patent) for a “Water Treatment Watering System” and brings this infringement action against Defendants Emerson Process Management LLLP and CITGO Petroleum Corporation.1 Defendants jointly moved for . summary judgment, arguing that the '336 patent is invalid because it covers non-patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted because the '336 patent…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Joao Control & Monitoring Systems, LLC v. Telular Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  2. Listingbook, LLC v. Market Leader, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015
  3. Network Apparel Group, LP v. Airwave Networks Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2015
  4. Oasis Tooling, Inc. v. Siemens Industry Software, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2024
  5. Rutherford v. GladieuxDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API