Neochloris, Inc. v. Emerson Process Management LLLP
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Honorable Edmond E. Chang, United States District Judge
I. Introduction
Plaintiff Neochloris owns patent number 6,845,336 (the '336 patent) for a “Water Treatment Watering System” and brings this infringement action against Defendants Emerson Process Management LLLP and CITGO Petroleum Corporation.1 Defendants jointly moved for . summary judgment, arguing that the '336 patent is invalid because it covers non-patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted because the '336 patent…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Joao Control & Monitoring Systems, LLC v. Telular Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Listingbook, LLC v. Market Leader, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015
- Network Apparel Group, LP v. Airwave Networks Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2015
- Oasis Tooling, Inc. v. Siemens Industry Software, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2024
- Rutherford v. GladieuxDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.