Legal Opinion
Bridgewater v. Mich. Gaming Control Bd.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided October 10, 2017No. Case Number 16–10782PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID M. LAWSON, United States District Judge
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RESCHEDULING FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
Plaintiff James Bridgewater, employed as a gaming engineering specialist by the Michigan Gaming Control Board (MGCB), suffers from a dermatological disease that causes severe disruption of his sleep. At one time, the MGCB authorized Bridgewater to work a flexible schedule, which allowed him to make up time he missed by working later in the work day and on weekends, and writing reports at home. Early in 2015, the MGCB terminated that arrangement, and…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Roger Monette and Doris Monette v. Electronic Data Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Saroki-Keller v. University of MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Smith v. Bryce CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2023
- Stevens 155008 v. Michigan Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2020