Legal Opinion

(PC) Franklin v. Tate

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 2, 2022No. 1:19-cv-01170Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEFFREY FRANKLIN, ) Case No. 1:19-cv-01170-AWI-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 13 v. ) RELIEF FROM THE JUDGMENT ) 14 HAROLD TATE, et al., (Doc. No. 44) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) 17 Plaintiff Jeffrey Franklin is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 18

1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for relief from the Court’s final judgment, filed 20 August 15, 2022. Defendant filed an opposition on August 29, 2022. (ECF No. 45.) 21 22…

2Cases cited11 opinions

Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
Egelhoff v. Egelhoff Ex Rel. BreinerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
Harvest v. CastroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
Jose Luis Pena v. Seguros La Comercial, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
Meadows v. Dominican RepublicCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.