Legal Opinion
Bell v. Southfield
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided January 5, 2024No. 2:19-cv-13565Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION GENE RAYMOND BELL, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:19-cv-13565 OFFICER ANTHONIE KORKIS, OFFICER ARTHUR BRIDGEFORTH, and District Judge OFFICER THOMAS LANGEWICZ, II, Gershwin A. Drain Jointly and severally and in their Individual capacities, Defendants. ______________ / ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [#77] This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant police officers Anthonie Korkis, Arthur Bridgeforth, and Thomas Langewicz, II (“Defendants”). ECF No. 77. Upon…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Ash v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.