Legal Opinion

Edward J. Brenner, Commissioner of Patents v. Robert J. Ebbert and Design Products Corporation

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 28, 1968No. 21346PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMM, Circuit Judge.

This case concerns a question of procedure in the Patent Office. After applying for a patent, appellee Ebbert received from the Patent Office a notice of allowance, dated April 21, 1966. It was captioned “NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE AND ISSUE FEE DUE,” and among other things stated: “With the allowance of the application, the above indicated Issue Fee becomes due and payment must be made within three months of the date of this Notice or the Patent will become abandoned (forfeited).” (Emphasis supplied.) Joint Appendix at 54. The issue fee was not paid within three months because…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Roller v. HollySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Goodrich v. FerrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gerald Glen Boyden v. Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  2. Gosch v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Apartment & Office Building Ass'n of Metropolitan Washington v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Lakeshore Broadcasting, Inc.,appellant v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  5. Tafas v. DudasDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API