Legal Opinion

Jewett v. Martinsville Milling Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 21, 1935No. 5320Published

1Opinion of the Court

ALSCHULER, Circuit Judge.

The suit was brought by appellee, the milling company, to effect set-off of alleged mutual debts between the parties, the debts being (a) a deposit by appellee in the bank now in receivership, and (b) a promissory note for an amount less than this deposit, executed by appellee’s president alone, but alleged in the complaint to represent a debt of the milling company to the bank.

The generally applicable law governing the right of set-off is not in dispute. Concededly there must be mutuality of obligation, i. e., the debts must be owing between the same persons and in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Scammon v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Gray v. RolloSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. WooldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Shannon v. SutherlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API