People v. Cortez
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Concurrence
O’CONNELL, EJ.
(concurring). I concur that defendant’s convictions must be affirmed. I write separately to address the broader issue whether, by attempting to maneuver the multifaceted principles of Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436; 86 S Ct 1602; 16 L Ed 2d 694 (1966), into the simple structure of prison safety administration, we risk shattering both the Miranda rationale and the prison safety structure. Caselaw confirms that the Miranda principles are a vital set of judicially created and proliferated procedures that protect free citizens against the serious danger of coercive pressure during…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Howes v. FieldsSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.