Legal Opinion

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Sams

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1989No. D.D. 88-23PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

We concur with the board’s findings and its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Wright and Resnick, JJ., dissent.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Whitt v. BennettOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. CrossmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. FeneliOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. FeneliOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. SamsOhio Supreme Court · 1989