State v. Hickey
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
FINCH, Chief Justice.
This is an original proceeding in quo warranto the object of which is to oust respondent as a member of the House of Representatives on the theory that by removing his residence from the district from which he was elected (which relators allege respondent has done) he has vacated his office under the provisions of Article III, § 13 of the Constitution of Missouri.1 That section provides as follows: “If any senator or representative remove his residence from the district or county for which he was elected, his office shall thereby be vacated.”
The language of § 13 is both…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- French v. SenateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- State ex rel. Biggs v. CorleySupreme Court of Delaware · 1934
- State v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
- State v. BanksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- Commonwealth v. Allen, Huhn & ShaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Gralike v. WalshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- In re MarshallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- State ex rel. Carrington v. HumanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- State ex rel. Foster v. MorrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Commonwealth ex rel. Greene v. WilleyRichmond County Circuit Court · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.