Legal Opinion
In re Marshall
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided March 14, 1972No. 57765PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEILER, Judge.
This is mandamus. The question before us is whether, under Secs. 21.380-410, RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S., the speaker of the house of representatives must, upon request of a member of the house, issue subpoenas in the matter of a charge made in the house that a member has removed his residence from his district and thereby vacated his office under Art. Ill, Sec. 13, 1945 Constitution, V.A.M.S. The tendered subpoenas are first, subpoenas for witnesses to appear before a notary public and depose and testify, and, second, subpoenas for witnesses to appear before a notary public to depose…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jenks v. JenksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
- State v. BanksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- LAWYERS'ASSOCIATION OF ST. LOUIS v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- State Ex Rel. Donnell v. OsbornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Dyer v. Union Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cason v. BondSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- State v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Laclede Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, WardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Klein v. AbramsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.