Ahrens v. State
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1ConcurrenceJustice Hearn
I concur in the majority’s resolution of the issues of estoppel, class certification, summary judgment as to the additional causes of action, and exhaustion of remedies. However, I part company with the majority on whether a contract existed and respectfully dissent. In my view, the old working retirees statutes, together with the mandatory forms signed by the working retirees, created a binding contract between the State and the working retirees which could not be unilaterally rescinded by the State with the passage of Act 153.
In its simplest terms, a contract is formed when a legitimate…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Furman University v. WallerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- Layman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- McLeod v. Sandy Island Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- McKinney v. South Carolina Police Officers Retirement SystemSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993