Legal Opinion

Moore's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1905No. 2; Appeal, No. 167PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 167, Jan. T., 1904, by Albert H. Moore, from decree of O. C. Phila. Co., July T., 1898, No. 56, dismissing exceptions to adjudication in estate of Andrew M. Moore, deceased. Exceptions to adjudication. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Errors assigned were in dismissing exceptions to adjudication.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion By

Mb. Justice Elkin,

The appellant contends under the first assignment of error that the accountants should not be allowed a credit of $500 claimed by them in the account filed, being the sum paid to the Fidelity Trust Company for its services in acting as trustee for the trust certificate holders, arranging the machinery of a loan, drawing up the papers, signing the certificates and acting as registrar. The auditing judge took this view and refused to allow credit for this item.. The court in banc reversed the finding of the auditing judge.

All of these acts were performed by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Young's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  2. Estates of WistarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  3. Appeal of BrolaskyPennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1883

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gardner's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Harrison's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  3. Lutz's EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Schuylkill County · 1941
  4. Williams EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Montgomery County · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API