Legal Opinion

Mintz v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Springfield

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 30, 2006No. CIV.A.04-10809-KPNPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WITH REGARD TO CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Document Nos. 28 and 26)

NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

This is an appeal by a number of home owners (“Plaintiffs”) in Lenox, Massachusetts, of a March 5, 2004 decision by the Lenox Zoning Board of Appeals pertaining to property owned by the Roman Catholic Bishop of Springfield (“the diocese”). Plaintiffs, who are abutters to the property, have sued the diocese, members of the Zoning Board of Appeals (“the ZBA”) and Lenox’s Assistant Building Inspector Edwin May (“May”) (together “Defendants”). The appeal was…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Cutter v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Congregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov, Inc. v. Village of PomonaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. Reaching Hearts International, Inc. v. Prince George's CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2008
  3. Schmitz v. Denton Cnty. Cowboy ChurchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  4. Roman Catholic Bishop v. City of SpringfieldDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  5. Congregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov, Inc. v. Village of PomonaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API