Legal Opinion

Street v. Ringsmyer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The plaintiff is the owner of a tract of land on the John Day River in Grant County. To gain access to the county road south of his lands, he purchased a roadway running in the direction of the public highway along the east boundary of land owned by the defendant. Immediately south of plaintiff’s lands and east of his roadway lies a tract owned by one Sterritt. The river runs northerly and westerly through the plaintiff’s lands. What is known as Max Robinson’s Slough heads near the river southeast of plaintiff’s lands, flows in a general *350westerly course until it enters the land of Sterritt,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Spain v. Oregon-Washington R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Gibbs v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  3. Armstrong v. Town of CosmopolisWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Simon v. NanceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  5. Barnett v. Matagorda Rice & Irrigation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1904

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Becker v. Tillamook Bay Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Wellman v. Kelley & HarrisonOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Garbarino v. VAN CLEAVEOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Harris v. HindmanOregon Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API