Legal Opinion

Bell, Metzner & Gierhart v. Stern

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 12, 1991No. 90-0906PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGartzke, P.J.

Attorney Walter Stern appeals from an order against him and in favor of the law firm Bell, Metzner & Gierhart for $4,850.82 attorney's fees and costs. The primary issues are whether the trial court had statutory authority to award attorney's fees and whether it abused its discretion in doing so. We conclude that the court intended to award fees under sec. 804.12(2), Stats., which authorizes a fee award for failing to comply with a discovery order, and the court did not abuse its discretion. We affirm.

The law firm represented Raymond Hamm in an action to obtain retirement disability benefits…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schneller v. St. Mary's Hospital Medical CenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Saenz v. MurphyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Kenosha County v. Town of ParisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Modica v. VerhulstCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  2. State v. HeyerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  3. Modica v. VerhulstCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API