Legal Opinion

Courtney v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided December 3, 1996No. 2481952PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENTON, Judge.

The trial judge found Deborah Hinton Courtney guilty of criminal contempt of court. Courtney contends that (1) the prosecution was barred by the Double Jeopardy Clause, (2) the trial judge erred by refusing to allow Courtney’s counsel to withdraw, (3) the trial judge erred by refusing Courtney’s request for a jury trial, and (4) the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction. We hold that the prosecution violated the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution, and we reverse the conviction.

I

The evidence proved that on December 5, 1994, the trial judge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Mitchell v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Terry Lee Harris v. R. A. Young, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  4. Rosser v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  5. Greenwalt v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Highsmith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
  2. Painter v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
  3. Kenyon v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
  4. Washington v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2001
  5. Greg Eugene Minitee, a/k/a Gregory Eugene Minitee v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API