Washington v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
FITZPATRICK, Chief Judge.
Darrell Washington (appellant) was convicted in a jury trial of robbery, in violation of Code § 18.2-58, and use of a firearm while committing a robbery, in violation of Code § 18.2-53.1. On appeal, he contends (1) his second trial violated the Fifth Amendment’s Double Jeopardy Clause1 and (2) the evidence *208was insufficient to prove Ms guilt. We agree that the double jeopardy prohibition bars his second trial and reverse and dismiss his convictions.
I
On December 15, 1999 appellant’s case was called for trial before the Honorable Paul Sheridan. Twenty people were called…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
- Commonwealth v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
- Washington v. Com.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2001
- Washington v. JarvisDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004