Reep v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1DissentMorrow, P. J.
The writer is unable to concur in the affirmance of the judgment.
The state relied ijipon the testimony of Earl Henry and his wife. Henry testified that he and the appellant made whisky together at the home of Henry, and described in detail the manner in which it was done, and on cross-examination testified that it was done more than once, and that his wife was present; that the kitchen stove was used' in making the whisky; that she took no actual part in the making of it.
Mrs. Henry testified that the appellant and her husband made whisky at her house twice; that they used a copper still and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Robert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Chandler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Chandler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- McElroy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.