Legal Opinion
In Re Hill Estate
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 1957No. 56, Calendar No. 47,351PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
349 Mich. 38 (1957)
84 N.W.2d 457
In re HILL ESTATE.
ORDWAY
v.
PRICE.
Docket No. 56, Calendar No. 47,351.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Decided July 31, 1957.
Henry E. Naegely, for proponent.
Leitson & Dean (Max Dean, of counsel), for contestants.
CARR, J.
The question at issue in this case is whether an instrument sought to be probated as the last will and testament of Maude Hill, deceased, was executed in compliance with statutory requirements. The facts are not in dispute. On June 4, 1955, Mrs. Hill entered the Chesaning State Bank and went to a window at which the assistant cashier of the bank, George…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Dalton EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Cook v. WinchesterMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- In Re Lane's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- In Re Cytacki's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- In re the Estate of FlynnNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Sutherby EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Williams v. BeechingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- In Re Blanchard EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re Blanchard EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1974