Mollinea v. Highmark Incorporated
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Cathy Mollinea, et al., No. CV-24-01080-PHX-SMB 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Highmark Incorporated, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court are Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 15) and Plaintiff 16 Cathy Mollinea’s Motion to Transfer Venue to the Western District of Pennsylvania 17 (Doc. 16). The briefing is complete, and upon review, the Court will deny Defendants’ 18 Motion and grant Plaintiff’s Motion. 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 Plaintiff is a licensed insurance agent who sells insurance…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.