Legal Opinion

Hartfield v. Howard

California Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1919No. L. A. No. 4949PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.

Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff foreclosing his mechanic’s lien. He appeals from that portion of the decree adjudicating his lien to be subsequent to the interest of the defendant Title Guarantee & Trust Company. The complaint contained the allegation: “That all of the defendants claim to have some interest or estate in said property and parcel of land, but this plaintiff is informed and believes, and therefore alleges on information and belief, that said claims are subject to and subservient to plaintiff’s claim.” The defendants, Title Guarantee & Trust Company and Fidelity…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lewis v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. Sichler v. LookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Smith v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. Beronio v. Ventura County Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Frost v. . KoonNew York Court of Appeals · 1864

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dobbins v. Economic Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Paramount Securities Co. v. DazeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Guardianship of LeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Fidelity Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SchaeferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API