Legal Opinion

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Updegrave

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 13, 1983No. 4404-1-IIIPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcInturff, J.

Is a showing of actual monetary damages a prerequisite to an award of attorney's fees under the Consumer Protection Act? We hold that attorney's fees may be awarded independently, without a showing of actual monetary damages.

In September 1973, the Lad Irrigation Company (Lad) obtained insurance from the St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company (St. Paul). The initial policy was effective for 3 years and was later extended by mutual agreement for an additional year. Premiums were to be paid on a composite rate basis.1 The policy provided that premiums could only be modified by a written…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State v. Reader's Digest Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Salois v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. In Re the Welfare of SnyderWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Beeson v. Atlantic-Richfield Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Mason v. Mortgage America, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Sign-O-Lite Signs, Inc. v. DeLaurenti Florists, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  4. Escalante v. Sentry InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  5. Edmonds v. John L. Scott Real Estate, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API