Nik-O-Lok Co. v. Carey
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. Despite cogent arguments addressed to the wisdom and desirability of the instant legislation, there is no question that the State has the power to prohibit or regulate the commercialization of toilet facilities. For analysis of some of the particular issues of unconstitutionality urged on grounds of due process of the law and equal protection of the laws, see opinion of Mr. Justice T. Paul Kane at the Appellate Division in Nik-O-Lok v Carey (52 AD2d 375).
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.
In Nik-O-Lok v Carey:…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nik-O-Lok Co. v. CareyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
3Cited by6 opinions
- Frank v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- In re VenturaNew York Supreme Court · 1981
- Katz v. ShapiroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- City of Albany v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Health Insurance Ass'n of America v. HarnettNew York Supreme Court · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.