Legal Opinion

Garland v. Director of Revenue

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 27, 1998No. 79920PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

Section 143.241.2, RSMo Supp.1993, makes an officer of a corporation “who has direct control ... or responsibility for filing [employer withholding tax] returns” personally hable for the amount of the tax when the corporation fails to file the return with the director of revenue. Section 143.751.4, RSMo 1994, imposes a penalty “equal to the total amount of the [employer withholding] tax evaded, or not collected” against a person required to collect and pay over the tax who ■willfully fails to do so. The issue in this case is whether these statutes permit both personal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Huckabee Auto Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  2. Abrams v. Ohio Pacific ExpressSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. Missouri Hospital Ass'n v. Air Conservation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Alexian Bros. of St. Louis, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. President Casino, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  2. Prapotnik v. CroweMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Investors Alliance, LLC v. BordeauxMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Jones v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  5. Sisco v. Bd. of Trus. of Police Retire. Sys.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API