Legal Opinion

Youngworth v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 26, 2002PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C.J.

General Laws c. 279, § 25, the habitual criminal statute, sets forth the elements required to trigger the imposition of the maximum statutory sentence for the felony on which a defendant is to be sentenced.1 We are asked to determine the validity of a habitual criminal indictment under *609the statute — which requires proof of two prior convictions “in this or another state” — where the indictment rested on one conviction in a State court and one conviction in a Federal court. A single justice of this court concluded that, because a conviction in a Federal court is not a conviction “in this or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Boston Herald, Inc. v. SharpeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. WotanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. RichardsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MaloneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. Bernardo B.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. GallMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. PelletierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API