Legal Opinion

People v. Thiel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 27, 1966PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and the facts, and a new trial granted. Memorandum: Since defendant made the inculpatory statement received against him on the trial subsequent to his arrest upon a warrant of arrest after information was filed, in the absence of counsel, such statement would not be admissible unless defendant waived his right to counsel prior to making the inculpatory statement. (People v. Bodie, 16 N Y 2d 275; People v. Santmyer, 20 A D 2d 960. It appears that defendant has no previous convictions, a 10th grade education, and is by occupation a laborer. Unlike the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. CoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. People v. DaghitaNew York Court of Appeals · 1950

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. BuckleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. People v. PerlsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. People v. LoretAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  5. People v. Lux, New York County Courts1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API