Legal Opinion

Hofler v. Hill

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 6, 1982No. 8115SC1080PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

The petitioner’s first assignment of error is to the court’s receiving evidence of the repurchase agreement and considering it in reaching its decision. The petitioner, relying on In re Watts, 38 N.C. App. 90, 247 S.E. 2d 427 (1978), argues that the only matters that can be heard on a motion pursuant to G.S. 45-21.16(d) are whether there is (1) á valid debt of which the party seeking foreclosure is the holder, (2) default, (3) the right to foreclose under the instrument, and (4) whether notice has been given to those entitled to receive it. We believe the court properly considered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Liles v. . RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  2. In Re the Foreclosure of a Certain Deed of Trust From WattsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. American National Fire Insurance Company v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Bunker v. . LlewellynSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Commissioners of McDowell County v. NicholsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hofler v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API