Hall v. Poteat
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
The rule is well established that judgment of nonsuit is proper when there is a fatal variance between a plaintiff’s allegata and probata. Proof without allegation is no better than allegation without proof. A plaintiff must make out his case secundum allegata. He cannot recover except on the case made by his pleading. Vickers v. Russell, 253 N.C. 394, 117 S.E. 2d 45; Lucas v. White, 248 N.C. 38, 102 S.E. 2d 387; Poultry Co. v. Equipment Co., 247 N.C. 570, 101 S.E. 2d 458, and eases cited. Whether the variance is to be deemed material (fatal) must be resolved in the light of the facts of each…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Whiteside v. McCarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Aiken v. SanderfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Lucas v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Lynn v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Spaugh v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Blake v. MallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- McCrillis v. a & W ENTERPRISES, INC.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Hall v. KimberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- Canady v. CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Henson v. Akers Motor Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.