Legal Opinion

Stone Fort Nat. Bank of Nacogdoches v. Hall

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1933No. 1443—6103PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYAN, Judge.

Relator, being without the remedy of a writ of error because the action of the trial court upon a plea of privilege is an interlocutory order within the final jurisdiction of the Court of Civil Appeals, seeks a writ of mandamus requiring the honorable justices of the Court of Civil Appeals for the Seventh Supreme Judicial District to certify to the Supreme Court an alleged conflict between the decision on the question of venue in this case, Stone Port Nat. Bank v. Forbess, 41 S.W.(2d) 695, and the decisions of other Courts of Civil Appeals (naming them) on the same question.

First.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Texas Seed & Floral Co. v. SchnoutzeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Pittman & Harrison Co. v. ShookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Stone Fort Nat. Bank of Nacogdoches v. ForbessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hendrix v. EverettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  2. First Nat. Bank of Levelland v. JaggersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API