Legal Opinion

Orvis v. Brownell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 16, 1953No. 404PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson

This suit, under § 9 (a) of the Trading with the Enemy Act,1 asks a decree that petitioners have an interest in vested property of Japanese nationals in the hands of the Alien Property Custodian, that he holds the prop*185erty subject to petitioners’ attachment lien and must satisfy their judgment. The controlling facts are not in controversy. The Japanese nationals involved were indebted to petitioners, while a third party, Anderson, Clayton & Co., was indebted to those Japanese. On June 14, 1941, Executive Order No. 8389 became effective as to Japan, and it blocked all transfers of evidences of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Propper v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Zittman v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Orvis v. McGrath Atty. GenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Dames & Moore v. ReganSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Kindhearts for Charitable Humanitarian Development, Inc. v. GeithnerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
  3. Mario Alfonso Tagle and Lourdes A. Martinez v. Donald T. Regan, as Secretary of Treasury of the United States, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. Security Pacific National Bank v. Government & State of IranDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1981
  5. Marschalk Co., Inc. v. Iran Nat. Airlines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API