Legal Opinion

Kern River Public Access Committee v. City of Bakersfield

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 9, 1985No. F003185PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRANSON, Acting P. J.

This appeal requires a determination of the meaning of various provisions of the “Public Access to Public Resources,” article 3.5 of the Government Code (§ 66478.1 to § 66478.14) which require a subdivider to provide reasonable public access to and an easement along a portion of the bank of any river or stream bordering or lying within a proposed subdivision. The decision will affect future subdivisions adjoining all navigable waters of this state.

The appellant and real party in interest, Kern River Development Company, Inc. (appellant), and its owner, George…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Serrano v. UnruhCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Press v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Marks v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Weeks v. Baker & McKenzieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Heavenly Valley v. El Dorado County Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. California Common Cause v. DuffyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Center for Biological Diversity v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Downey Cares v. Downey Community Development CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API