Legal Opinion

Evancho v. United States Steel Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 1962No. Civ. A. No. 30452PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUONGO, District Judge.

This is an action by a Korean War veteran under § 9 of the Universal Military Training Act of 1948, as amended, [50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 459] to compel his employer to advance his position from number 33 on the seniority work roster to number 15. The employer has moved, under Rule 19(b) F.R.C.P., to have joined as “necessary parties” those employees who currently hold numbers 15 to 32 as well as the Local and the International Union to which these men and plaintiff belong on the ground that they are “ * * * persons who are not indispensable, but who ought to be parties if…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Deavers v. Missouri, K. & T. R.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
  2. Wilson v. Illinois Central RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1957
  3. McKinney v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Minneapolis, Northfield & Southern Railway v. United Transportation UnionDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1980
  2. Muir v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API