Minneapolis, Northfield & Southern Railway v. United Transportation Union
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL
DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge.
This is a declaratory judgment action brought by Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern Railway (hereinafter the Railway) *337to determine and declare the relative seniority rights of defendants Brandt, Swenson, Hancock, and Skare, four of its engineer employees, under a collective bargaining agreement between the Railway and defendants United Transportation Union and United Transportation Union Local 650 (hereinafter the Unions) and under the Viet Nam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974, 38 U.S.C. § 2021, et…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Glover v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Czosek v. O'MARASupreme Court of the United States · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Todd Shipyards Corp. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Todd Shipyards Corporation v. Director, Office Of Workers' Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Stewart v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1984