Legal Opinion

Fust v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 22, 2024No. 2:23-cv-02853Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 DEBORAH FUST, INDIVIDUALLY AND No. 2:23-cv-2853 WBS DB ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS 13 SIMILARLY SITUATED; AND EDWARD PIMENTEL, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON 14 BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SITUATED, 15 Plaintiffs, 16 v. 17 GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., A 18 DELAWARE CORPORATION REGISTERED TO DO BUSINESS AND HEADQUARTERED 19 IN CALIFORNIA, 20 Defendant. 21 22 ----oo0oo---- 23 Plaintiffs Deborah Fust and Edward Pimentel originally 24 filed this putative class action against defendant Gilead 25…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API