State v. Pettit
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIDEL, Judge.
¶ 1 The State of Arizona appeals from the trial court’s suppression after a voluntariness hearing of statements the defendant made at the scene of his arrest and during his later custodial interrogation, none of which were preceded by Miranda warnings.
¶ 2 We reverse the trial court’s suppression of defendant’s prearrest statements, finding that defendant was not in custody and that Miranda warnings were not required. We affirm the trial court’s suppression of the statements defendant made during custodial interrogation, which the trial court found involuntary and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Walton v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Davis v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. Amaya-RuizArizona Supreme Court · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. ZamoraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- In Re Roy L.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- State v. BassettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State v. CruzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- State v. FenderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.