Legal Opinion
Philip Decohen v. Capital One, N.A.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided December 26, 2012No. 11-2161PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge DAVIS wrote the opinion, in which Judge SHEDD and Judge WYNN joined.
OPINION
DAVIS, Circuit Judge:
This appeal arises out of an allegation by Appellant Philip Decohen that he paid for something that he did not receive. The question presented is whether the Maryland law that protected his expectation is enforceable.
Decohen bought a used Chrysler Pacifi-ca and financed it with a loan from a Maryland car dealer, Nation Auto of Mar-low Heights (“Nation Auto”). The amount financed included a $600 charge for a “debt cancellation agreement.” Under the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Mayor of Balt. v. BP P. L.C.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Joseph Landino v. Betty SappCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Patton v. Wells Fargo Financial Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Decohen v. Abbasi, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- In re TD Bank, N.A.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.