Covert v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MADDOX, Justice.
The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in taxing one-half (½) of a guardian ad litem’s fees against the defendants, which included two minors for whose benefit the guardian ad litem was appointed. The issue grows out of a dispute over “excess” coverage in an insurance policy issued by The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (hereinafter “Aetna”) to the tort-feasor.
FACTS
On October 18, 1986, an automobile driven by Darlene S. Covert collided with a van driven by Audie R. Smith in Mobile, Alabama.1 As a consequence of that automobile collision, Darlene Covert was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Birmingham v. City of FairfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Walden v. WaldenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- Frawley v. U.S. Steel Min. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
3Cited by1 opinion
- Allstate Insurance v. JonesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1991