Legal Opinion

Covert v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 14, 1990No. 89-381PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MADDOX, Justice.

The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in taxing one-half (½) of a guardian ad litem’s fees against the defendants, which included two minors for whose benefit the guardian ad litem was appointed. The issue grows out of a dispute over “excess” coverage in an insurance policy issued by The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (hereinafter “Aetna”) to the tort-feasor.

FACTS

On October 18, 1986, an automobile driven by Darlene S. Covert collided with a van driven by Audie R. Smith in Mobile, Alabama.1 As a consequence of that automobile collision, Darlene Covert was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. City of FairfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Walden v. WaldenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  3. Frawley v. U.S. Steel Min. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Allstate Insurance v. JonesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API