People ex rel. Teller v. Littlejohn
Michigan Supreme Court
Motion for a mandamus. The facts are stated in the ■opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Campbell J.:
■ This is an application for a mandamus. Teller being plaintiff in a suit tried before respondent, alleged exceptions upon the trial, which was without a jury. The exceptions were to the decision of the Court upon the effect of the plaintiff’s evidence — that decision involving questions of law. In pursuance of an understanding between the counsel in the presence of the Judge, he ordered that plaintiff might make and serve a bill of exceptions in twenty days, giving defendant twenty days to propose amendments, and providing for ten days notice of settlement. This order was never…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Dennis v. KendrickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- State v. SneedTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
- Harper v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- People ex rel. De Moss v. Van Buren Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. v. KearneyCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.