Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Teller v. Littlejohn

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1862PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Motion for a mandamus. The facts are stated in the ■opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell J.:

■ This is an application for a mandamus. Teller being plaintiff in a suit tried before respondent, alleged exceptions upon the trial, which was without a jury. The exceptions were to the decision of the Court upon the effect of the plaintiff’s evidence — that decision involving questions of law. In pursuance of an understanding between the counsel in the presence of the Judge, he ordered that plaintiff might make and serve a bill of exceptions in twenty days, giving defendant twenty days to propose amendments, and providing for ten days notice of settlement. This order was never…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dennis v. KendrickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. State v. SneedTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Harper v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. People ex rel. De Moss v. Van Buren Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. v. KearneyCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API