ASARCO, LLC v. Montana Resources, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
ANDREW S. HANEN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure filed by Montana Resources, Inc. and Montana Resources, LLP.1 [Doc. No. 28; Br. in Supp., Doc. No. 24; Supplement to Mot., Doc. No. 78]. Having reviewed the motion, the responses thereto and the applicable law, the Court hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ motion.
I. Factual Background and Procedural History
A. Montana Resources, LLP
In May 1989, AR Montana Corporation, predecessor of ASARCO…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Lawrence H. Ramming v. United States of America, John Thomas Cloud v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- All-Tex Staffing & Pers., Inc. v. Sarah Romo Torres (In re All-Tex Staffing & Pers., Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2019
- Matlock Realty Enterprise, Inc. v. Crown Financial, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2016
- Quality Construction & Production L L C v. CollinsDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2021