Legal Opinion

Noriega v. Pastrana

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 25, 2010No. 09-35Relating-to

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as:

559 U. S. ____

(2010) 1 THOMAS, J., dissenting SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES MANUEL ANTONIO NORIEGA v. GEORGE PASTRANA, WARDEN ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 09–35. Decided January 25, 2010 The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. JUSTICE THOMAS, with whom JUSTICE SCALIA joins, dissenting from denial of certiorari. “[I]n our tripartite system of government,” it is the duty of this Court to “say ‘what the law is.’ ” Boumediene v. Bush,

553 U. S. ___

(2008) (slip op., at 36) (quoting Mar­ bury v. Madison,

1…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Rasul v. BushSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Medellin v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Ex Parte Bollman and SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1807

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API