Legal Opinion

Hartzberg v. New York Central Railroad

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1943PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBotein, J.

This is an action brought by a firm of wholesale diamond dealers against a railroad carrier to recover the value of the contents of a jeweler’s sample trunk, allegedly lost through the negligence of the carrier. The suit, by stipulation, was tried without a jury and the parties waived findings of fact and conclusions of law.

At 6:20 p. m., on June 17,1941, the plaintiffs’ trunk was delivered by a local transfer company to the baggage room of the *131defendant’s railroad station at Detroit, Michigan. There was no disclosure to the baggage-room attendant, nor was there any inquiry by him, concerning…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lichten v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  2. Lichten v. Eastern Airlines, IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. SlifkinDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1961
  4. Lichten v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  5. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry. v. HamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API