Legal Opinion

State v. Board of Education

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 30, 1916No. Nos. 19,796—(194)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In proceedings in the district court for St. Louis county to enforce payment of taxes'on real estate remaining delinquent on the first Monday in January, 1915, the board of education of the city of Duluth interposed its separate answer with respect to a certain parcel of land occupied by the Fond du Lac school. The facts were stipulated.

Read the full summary

In proceedings in the district court for St. Louis county to enforce payment of taxes'on real estate remaining delinquent on the first Monday in January, 1915, the board of education of the city of Duluth interposed its separate answer with respect to a certain parcel of land occupied by the Fond du Lac school. The facts were stipulated. The matter was heard before Cant, J., who found that the land was exempt from taxation and from city assessments and ordered judgment in favor of the board of education, canceling certain assessments against the property. From the judgment entered pursuant to…

1Per curiam

This case is ruled by the case of State v. Board of Education of City of Duluth, supra, page 386, 158 N. W. 635. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that’ case the judgment appealed from in this case is affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State Ex Rel. Smiley v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Beidler v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  4. State ex rel. Bodman v. Probate Court of County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  5. In Re Estate of TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API