Legal Opinion

Hesthagen v. Harby

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1971No. 39916Published

1Opinion of the Court

78 Wn.2d 934 (1971)

481 P.2d 438

GUNVOR HARBY HESTHAGEN et al., Appellants,

v.

GUNDA HARBY et al., Appellants, THEODORE C. BLOMBERG et al., Respondents.[*]

No. 39916.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

February 25, 1971.

Clifford C. Benson, for appellants Hesthagen et al.

Hoof, Shucklin & Harris and Bryan & Harrod, by Gerald Shucklin, for appellants Harby.

Wallace & Fraser, by Philip M. Best, for respondents Blomberg et al.

FINLEY, J.

This is a collateral attack upon the final distribution of the assets of the estate of one Maja Harby, deceased. Plaintiffs, complaining heirs, are the nieces and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Lough v. John Davis & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. GooleyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Hesthagen v. HarbyWashington Supreme Court · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API