Legal Opinion
CARL v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA
District Court, D. Maine
Decided June 15, 2021No. 2:19-cv-00504Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE DAVID CARL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Docket no. 2:19-cv-00504-GZS ) FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ORDER ON PENDING CROSS-MOTIONS Before the Court are two Cross-Motions: (1) the Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant First National Bank of Omaha (“FNBO”) (ECF No. 39); and (2) the Motion for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff David Carl (ECF No. 40). Having reviewed the Motions and related submissions filed by the parties (ECF Nos. 41–51 & 53–56), the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion (ECF No. 39) and DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion (ECF No.…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.