People v. McDade
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Legally sufficient evidence supports defendant Susan McDade’s conviction of second-degree rape. Forensic DNA testing of a penile swab from the victim, a severely mentally disabled 17-year-old boy, revealed the existence of significant amounts of defendant’s DNA, which established that defendant had extended, noncasual contact with the victim’s penis. Eyewitness evidence established that both the victim and defendant were naked. Moreover, the People elicited additional evidence that the victim, who had the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bright v. McGowanNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- Zakrzewska v. the New SchoolNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. ChanceyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. WileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. ElioffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. KuzdzalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.