Legal Opinion
Bolds v. Woods
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 29, 1894No. 1,097PublishedCited by 10 opinions
From the Adams Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.
Woods sued Bolds, and recovered damages of him for alleged fraud and deceit in the exchange of real estate.
The overruling of the appellant’s demurrer to the appellee’s amended complaint is claimed to be reversible error.
It appears from the averments of the complaint, that in June, 1890, the parties were both residents of Adams county, Indiana, and that Woods was the owner of a steam flouring mill situated in the town of Geneva, in said county, upon lot No. 256, in said town, which then was, and still is, of the value of $8,500; that Bolds was at that time, and is still, a resident of said…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Nysewander v. LowmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Ellis v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Parker v. MoultonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. SteinIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Dillman v. NadlehofferIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- New v. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- State ex rel. McClure v. Marion Superior CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
- Taylor v. State ex rel. OgleIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Scott v. BurnightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Firebaugh v. TroughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.